Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 50 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Sign upGitHub is where the world builds software
Millions of developers and companies build, ship, and maintain their software on GitHub — the largest and most advanced development platform in the world.
No coverage data, when running with a_include_objects from different schema #511
Comments
|
I guess to solve this you'll change the public API of ut_runner, won't you? I think any change has also be included in Java-API and CLI |
|
I will start by fixing the functionality. |
|
Yes of course, finally got myself into both, API and CLI so I'm ready to update them if there are any changes to public API. Will also create an issue in Java-API-Project |
Coverage can now be gathered with `a_include_objects` parameter Resolves #511
When I execute the tests as below:
The coverage report is empty.
I need to explicitly specify
a_coverage_schemes=>ut_varchar2_list( user )as a parameter, even though the owner of the object is included as part of thea_include_objectsparameter.The behavior should be:
It doesn't really make sense to support combinations of those 3 parameters.
Those parameters should be mutually exclusive.
So users should only provide one of parameters not a combination of those.
Current implementation sets value of
a_coverage_schemesto be CURRENT_SCHEMA, if not value was provided. This makes thea_include_objectsfilter useless without specifying schema names.