★ wanayoo — archive 1999 https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/32651Nouvelle recherche | Portail wanayoo
Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

perf_hooks: allow omitted parameters in 'performance.measure' #32651

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

perf_hooks: allow omitted parameters in 'performance.measure' #32651

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

Himself65
Copy link
Member

@Himself65 Himself65 commented Apr 4, 2020 •
edited

FIxes: #32647
Refs: https://www.w3.org/TR/user-timing-2/#measure-method

const { PerformanceObserver, performance } = require('perf_hooks');

const obs = new PerformanceObserver((items) => {
  console.log(items.getEntries()[0].duration);
  performance.clearMarks();
});
obs.observe({ entryTypes: ['measure'] });
performance.measure('Start to Now');

performance.mark('A');
doSomeLongRunningProcess(() => {
  performance.measure('A to Now', 'A');

  performance.mark('B');
  performance.measure('A to B', 'A', 'B');
});
Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • documentation is changed or added
  • commit message follows commit guidelines

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added c++ perf_hooks labels Apr 4, 2020
@Himself65 Himself65 marked this pull request as ready for review Apr 4, 2020
addaleax
addaleax reviewed Apr 4, 2020
View changes
Copy link
Member

@addaleax addaleax left a comment

This probably needs a changes: entry for the documentation and tests.

doc/api/perf_hooks.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@Himself65
Copy link
Member Author

@Himself65 Himself65 commented Apr 4, 2020

This probably needs a changes: entry for the documentation and tests.

I have no idea how to add a test for these additions, any suggestions?

addaleax
addaleax reviewed Apr 4, 2020
View changes
Copy link
Member

@addaleax addaleax left a comment

This probably needs a changes: entry for the documentation and tests.

I have no idea how to add a test for these additions, any suggestions?

Not really, because it isn’t quite obvious to me what exactly these changes end up doing.

doc/api/perf_hooks.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@Himself65
Copy link
Member Author

@Himself65 Himself65 commented Apr 4, 2020 •
edited

Not really, because it isn’t quite obvious to me what exactly these changes end up doing.

// test.js
const { PerformanceObserver, performance } = require('perf_hooks');

const obs = new PerformanceObserver((items) => {
  console.log(items.getEntries()[0].duration);
  performance.clearMarks();
});
obs.observe({ entryTypes: ['measure'] });

setTimeout(() => {
  performance.measure('Foo');
  performance.mark('B')
  performance.measure('to B', 'nodeStart', 'B');
}, 1000);
./Release/node.exe test.js
1029.4472
1033.832401

addaleax
addaleax reviewed Apr 4, 2020
View changes
doc/api/perf_hooks.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@addaleax
Copy link
Member

@addaleax addaleax commented Apr 4, 2020

@Himself65 I guess that example could serve as the basis for a test then?

@Himself65 Himself65 force-pushed the 20200404-perf_hooks branch 3 times, most recently from bf42542 to b420270 Compare Apr 4, 2020
legendecas
legendecas reviewed Apr 5, 2020
View changes
doc/api/perf_hooks.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
addaleax
addaleax reviewed Apr 5, 2020
View changes
doc/api/perf_hooks.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
lib/perf_hooks.js Show resolved Hide resolved
@Himself65 Himself65 force-pushed the 20200404-perf_hooks branch 3 times, most recently from 0b38140 to f85faa4 Compare Apr 5, 2020
addaleax
addaleax reviewed Apr 5, 2020
View changes
Copy link
Member

@addaleax addaleax left a comment

LGTM with tests added 👍

lib/perf_hooks.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@Himself65 Himself65 force-pushed the 20200404-perf_hooks branch 2 times, most recently from e9ec51a to 25bd57d Compare Apr 6, 2020
legendecas
legendecas reviewed Apr 6, 2020
View changes
lib/perf_hooks.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@Himself65
perf_hooks: allow omitted parameters in 'performance.measure'
3618a2a 
Make `startMark` and `endMark` parameters optional.
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot commented Apr 7, 2020

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/30526/

@Himself65 Himself65 added the author ready label Apr 9, 2020
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot commented Apr 9, 2020

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/30583/

@Himself65 Himself65 self-assigned this Apr 10, 2020
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot commented Apr 10, 2020

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/30609/

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot commented Apr 10, 2020

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/30611/

@Himself65
Copy link
Member Author

@Himself65 Himself65 commented Apr 10, 2020 •
edited

I think CI should all green but

image

They are old CI state, maybe some bug here

Himself65 added a commit to Himself65/node that referenced this issue Apr 10, 2020
@Himself65
perf_hooks: allow omitted parameters in 'performance.measure'
d0a3bf1 
Make `startMark` and `endMark` parameters optional.

PR-URL: nodejs#32651
Fixes: nodejs#32647
Refs: https://www.w3.org/TR/user-timing-2/#measure-method
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Chengzhong Wu <legendecas@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
@Himself65
Copy link
Member Author

@Himself65 Himself65 commented Apr 10, 2020

Landed in d0a3bf1

@Himself65 Himself65 closed this Apr 10, 2020
@Himself65 Himself65 deleted the 20200404-perf_hooks branch Apr 10, 2020
targos pushed a commit that referenced this issue Apr 12, 2020
@Himself65 @targos
perf_hooks: allow omitted parameters in 'performance.measure'
1a01ac3 
Make `startMark` and `endMark` parameters optional.

PR-URL: #32651
Fixes: #32647
Refs: https://www.w3.org/TR/user-timing-2/#measure-method
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Chengzhong Wu <legendecas@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
@targos targos mentioned this pull request Apr 13, 2020
Merged
BethGriggs pushed a commit that referenced this issue Apr 14, 2020
@Himself65 @BethGriggs
perf_hooks: allow omitted parameters in 'performance.measure'
89df2eb 
Make `startMark` and `endMark` parameters optional.

PR-URL: #32651
Fixes: #32647
Refs: https://www.w3.org/TR/user-timing-2/#measure-method
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Chengzhong Wu <legendecas@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this issue Apr 22, 2020
@Himself65 @targos
perf_hooks: allow omitted parameters in 'performance.measure'
f302ac9 
Make `startMark` and `endMark` parameters optional.

PR-URL: #32651
Fixes: #32647
Refs: https://www.w3.org/TR/user-timing-2/#measure-method
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Chengzhong Wu <legendecas@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
@targos targos mentioned this pull request Apr 22, 2020
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@jasnell jasnell

@addaleax addaleax

@legendecas legendecas

Assignees

@Himself65 Himself65

Labels
author ready c++ perf_hooks
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

perf_hooks: measure() should allow endMark to be omitted
5 participants
@Himself65 @addaleax @nodejs-github-bot @jasnell @legendecas