★ wanayoo — archive 1999 https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/30971Nouvelle recherche | Portail wanayoo
Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: add missing test flags #30971

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

test: add missing test flags #30971

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

cjihrig
Copy link
Contributor

@cjihrig cjihrig commented Dec 15, 2019

test-wasi-start-validation.js should require the --experimental-wasi-unstable-preview0 flag in order to run. However, due to a recent regression, that hasn't been enforced. #30963 fixes the regression and will cause this test to start (correctly) failing. This commit adds the missing flag.

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • tests and/or benchmarks are included
  • commit message follows commit guidelines

test-wasi-start-validation.js should require the
--experimental-wasi-unstable-preview0 flag in order to run.
However, due to a recent regression, that hasn't been enforced.
nodejs#30963 fixes the regression
and will cause this test to start (correctly) failing. This
commit adds the missing flag.
Trott
Trott approved these changes Dec 15, 2019
@Trott
Copy link
Member

@Trott Trott commented Dec 15, 2019

Fast-track to unblock #30963?

@Trott
Copy link
Member

@Trott Trott commented Dec 15, 2019

Or another suggestion: Close this PR and add this commit as a first commit in #30963.

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot commented Dec 15, 2019

@Trott
Copy link
Member

@Trott Trott commented Dec 15, 2019

Landed in 2097a6f

@Trott Trott closed this Dec 15, 2019
Trott added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 15, 2019
test-wasi-start-validation.js should require the
--experimental-wasi-unstable-preview0 flag in order to run.
However, due to a recent regression, that hasn't been enforced.
#30963 fixes the regression
and will cause this test to start (correctly) failing. This
commit adds the missing flag.

PR-URL: #30971
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com>
@cjihrig cjihrig deleted the test-fix branch Dec 15, 2019
MylesBorins added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 17, 2019
test-wasi-start-validation.js should require the
--experimental-wasi-unstable-preview0 flag in order to run.
However, due to a recent regression, that hasn't been enforced.
#30963 fixes the regression
and will cause this test to start (correctly) failing. This
commit adds the missing flag.

PR-URL: #30971
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com>
@MylesBorins MylesBorins mentioned this pull request Dec 17, 2019
targos added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 14, 2020
test-wasi-start-validation.js should require the
--experimental-wasi-unstable-preview0 flag in order to run.
However, due to a recent regression, that hasn't been enforced.
#30963 fixes the regression
and will cause this test to start (correctly) failing. This
commit adds the missing flag.

PR-URL: #30971
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com>
BethGriggs pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 6, 2020
test-wasi-start-validation.js should require the
--experimental-wasi-unstable-preview0 flag in order to run.
However, due to a recent regression, that hasn't been enforced.
#30963 fixes the regression
and will cause this test to start (correctly) failing. This
commit adds the missing flag.

PR-URL: #30971
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com>
@MylesBorins MylesBorins mentioned this pull request Feb 8, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Linked issues

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants