★ wanayoo — archive 1999 https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/22008Nouvelle recherche | Portail wanayoo
Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: remove custom AsyncHooksTestConfiguration #22008

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

Copy link
Member

@maclover7 maclover7 commented Jul 28, 2018

Has the same behavior as ParallelTestConfiguration, so switch to using that :)

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • commit message follows commit guidelines

Has the same behavior as `ParallelTestConfiguration`
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added async_hooks test labels Jul 28, 2018
@maclover7
Copy link
Member Author

@maclover7 maclover7 commented Jul 28, 2018

@Trott
Copy link
Member

@Trott Trott commented Jul 29, 2018 •

@maclover7 maclover7 added the author ready label Jul 29, 2018
@maclover7
Copy link
Member Author

@maclover7 maclover7 commented Jul 31, 2018

Landed in 3a056c0

@maclover7 maclover7 closed this Jul 31, 2018
@maclover7 maclover7 deleted the jm-simplify-test branch Jul 31, 2018
maclover7 added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 31, 2018
Has the same behavior as `ParallelTestConfiguration`

PR-URL: #22008
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jul 31, 2018
Has the same behavior as `ParallelTestConfiguration`

PR-URL: #22008
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
@targos targos mentioned this pull request Jul 31, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
async_hooks author ready test
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants