doc: remove confusing note about child process stdio #19552
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
It’s not obvious what the paragraph is supposed to say. In particular, whether and what kind of buffering mechanism a process uses for its stdio streams does not affect that, in general, no guarantees can be made about when it consumes data that was sent to it.
Trott
approved these changes
Mar 23, 2018
|
Here's the commit where it was originally introduced: 22d3eff |
trivikr
approved these changes
Mar 24, 2018
jasnell
approved these changes
Mar 24, 2018
|
Landing... |
|
Landed in 189eaa0 |
BethGriggs
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 26, 2018
It’s not obvious what the paragraph is supposed to say. In particular, whether and what kind of buffering mechanism a process uses for its stdio streams does not affect that, in general, no guarantees can be made about when it consumes data that was sent to it. PR-URL: #19552 Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
targos
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 27, 2018
It’s not obvious what the paragraph is supposed to say. In particular, whether and what kind of buffering mechanism a process uses for its stdio streams does not affect that, in general, no guarantees can be made about when it consumes data that was sent to it. PR-URL: #19552 Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
BethGriggs
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 4, 2018
It’s not obvious what the paragraph is supposed to say. In particular, whether and what kind of buffering mechanism a process uses for its stdio streams does not affect that, in general, no guarantees can be made about when it consumes data that was sent to it. PR-URL: #19552 Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Merged
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
It’s not obvious what the paragraph is supposed to say.
In particular, whether and what kind of buffering mechanism a process uses for its stdio streams does not affect that, in general, no guarantees can be made about when it consumes data that was sent to it.
Checklist
make -j4 test(UNIX), orvcbuild test(Windows) passes