Refs: nodejs/node#18879

This needs some tests to land...also I plan to reuse some bits of it to implement the nomination template proposed in nodejs/node#18090 (comment)

Nice work!

I can do the tests if you give me a few days (I have not much time ATM).

@alopezsanchez Thanks, I'll first play with it for a few days to make sure this covers what I want as the initial implementation, then it'll be more ready to test. I still need to figure out how to make the cache work properly (I don't really think the users need them, they are mostly for developing and debugging)

Very nice, who does it bring up at the moment as no activity in the last year?

Some feedback I've gathered:

1. Need to add options to account for Reviewed-By fields in--type commit
2. authoredDate -> committedDate in--type commit
3. Would be nice if there are some percentiles

@benjamingr I have posted my findings in nodejs/node#18879 (comment) , don't want to post the names in public but I can send you a gist if you want to see the list.

Codecov Report

Merging #186 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #186   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   88.52%   88.52%           
=======================================
  Files          19       19           
  Lines         723      723           
=======================================
  Hits          640      640           
  Misses         83       83

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 3dafebf...d30abc5. Read the comment docs.

@joyeecheung do you think you still plan to work on this, or may it be closed as abandoned?

This PR is stale because it has been open many days with no activity. It will be closed soon unless the stale label is removed or a comment is made.

Closing but if someone would like to pick this up again please reopen :)